# How to use empirical formulas to estimate the resistance of a Ship

Resistance estimation holds immense importance in the design stage of a vessel. Based on the results of the resistance estimation of a vessel, the selection of the right propulsion system is done.

There are three methods which are commonly used for ship resistance estimation

**Empirical methods**– depending on the type and shape of the vessel, empirical methods like Holtrop-Mennen can be deployed for ship-shaped vessels. For planing and semi-planing craft, similarly, there is a multitude of methods like Mercier Savitsky, Fung etc. These methods are based on years of model testing data which are plotted in forms of charts/curves to provide resistance coefficients. The calculation of resistance follows the simple physical formulation of Force = Pressure x Area. However, these methods don’t provide a highly accurate or customized result and are mostly used only in early design stages.**CFD Analyses**– CFD analysis is a way to get much more customized and ‘closer to reality’ assessment of a ship’s resistance. This involves creating a complete 3D model of the vessel in a software which can perform fluid simulations and calculate the hydrodynamic forces on its body. However, CFD analyses can be performed only once the hull modeling (linesplan) of the vessel has been finalized. Also, CFD analyses are time consuming and may prove costly in preliminary design stages too.**Model testing**– the most accurate and reliable method for calculating a ship’s resistance is by performing a model test. It involves building a scaled down model of the actual vessel, performing tests on it in a model basin, and extrapolating the results to the actual vessel. However, model tests are usually performed at the end of the design cycle, and they are quite cost-prohibitive.

In the early design stages, with limited data available, empirical methods can be used to give a fair estimate of a ship’s resistance.

## The Holtrop-Mennen method

In this article, we will discuss in detail an empirical method called the Holtrop-Mennen method, which is commonly used for ship-shaped vessels. This method was developed after performing regression analyses of random model experiments and full-scale data. The first publication of the method was in 1978 (See Ref 1), and it was further refined in 1982 to include some unconventional combinations of the main parameters of the vessel.

The method is limited to conventional ship-shaped vessels and is not to be applied for planning/semi-planing or high-speed crafts.

## Components of a ship’s resistance and their estimation

The total resistance of the ship is subdivided into many components (see Ref 2):

- Frictional Resistance of the ship (R
_{F}) – this is the resistance which the ship’s hull’s surface encounters as a result of moving against water. - Appendage resistance (R
_{APP}) – this is the resistance which is experienced by the appendages on the ship – bilge keels, rudder, shafts, shaft brackets, struts etc. - Wave-making resistance (R
_{W}) – this is the resistance which the ship encounters as a result of making waves on the free surface as it moves - Bulbous-bow resistance (R
_{B}) – if the ship has a bulbous bow, it contributes to additional resistance near the water surface where the bulb emerges out of water - Additional resistance of transom stern (R
_{TR}) – if the ship has a transom stern, it leads to additional pressure resistance due to an immersed transom - Model-ship correlation resistance (R
_{A}) – this is an additional factor which is introduced to take into account for hull roughness.

We’ll now take them up one-by-one and describe the empirical methods for each.

## Frictional Resistance of the ship’s hull (R_{F})

The frictional resistance of the ship’s hull is calculated from the basic formula for resistance which the ship’s hull surface experiences by moving against a viscous fluid (water):

Resistance = Resistance Coefficient x pressure x Surface Area

Pressure = ½ ρV^{2}

Surface area = wetted surface area of the vessel.

The resistance coefficient is a function of the speed of the fluid and its viscosity. It is derived from the ITTC 1957 formula

Here, Rn is the Reynolds’ number of the fluid, which is calculated according to the formula below:

Rn = VL/ν

Where, V = relative speed of the vessel against water (includes current speed)

L = Length of vessel on waterline

ν = Viscosity of Water

The above formula for C_{F} was adopted by the International Towing Tank Conference (ITTC) in 1957 at Madrid.

However, the frictional resistance coefficient was based on two-dimensional flat resistance theory, and didn’t take into account the three-dimensional form of the vessel. To account for this, a new factor called ‘form-factor’, k1, was introduced. Thus, the total frictional resistance of the vessel is

Frictional Resistance = R_{F} x (1 + k1)

where R_{F} = 1/2 ρ_{water}SV^{2} X C_{F}

S = wetted surface area of hull

V = relative speed of water vs the hull

C_{F} = Resistance coefficient as per ITTC 1957 formula

As per Holtrop-Mennen formulation, the form factor ‘k1’ is obtained from the formula below:

This involves calculations of multiple parameters like prismatic coefficient, length of run, and coefficient for stern shape which can be obtained from the geometric particulars of the vessel in question.

The wetted area of the hull can be calculated from the empirical formula below:

## Appendage Resistance (R_{APP})

The vessel may have multiple appendages to the hull. These may include – Rudder, Shafts, Shaft brackets, skeg, strut bossings, hull bossings, stabilizer fins, bilge keels etc. In a similar manner to the hull resistance, the resistance of the appendages of the vessel can be found out from a similar formula

**Appendage Resistance R _{APP} = 1/2 ρ_{water}(ΣS_{APP})_{ }V^{2} x (1 + k2)_{eq} x C_{F}**

The term **1/2 ρ _{water}(ΣS_{APP})_{ }V^{2 }**is the pressure on the entire surface area of all appendages. ΣS

_{APP}= Total Wetted Surface Area of all Appendages. V = Vessel Fwd Speed (including current speed). ρ

_{water}= Density of Water

**C _{F}** = Resistance Coefficient as per ITTC 1957 (C

_{F}= 0.075 / [log

_{10}R)-2]

^{2}where R = Reynolds Number (R = VL/ν), ν = Viscosity of Water, L = Waterline Length

The factor (1 + k2)_{eq} is the appendage resistance factor (similar to the hull’s form factor) and is an area-weighted average of the factors for different appendages.

(1 + k2)_{eq} = Σ{(1 + k2) S_{APP}}/(ΣS_{APP}), where (1 + k2) value for different appendages are taken from Table below

A simple table for calculating (1 + k2)_{eq} can be created as below:

** **

## Wave making Resistance (R_{W})

When a completely submerged body moves in a non-viscous fluid, then the net force on the body (due to pressure normal to the surface of the body) is zero. This is because the pressures on the aft and forward halves cancel each other.

However, when the body moves with part of it above water, it creates waves which alter the pressure distribution around the hull and cause a net fore-and-aft force (see Ref [2]). This is called the wave making resistance, i.e., the force expended by the ship to maintain the wave system it creates at the free surface.

It is to be noted that this is NOT the resistance due the waves which are present in the sea. It is the resistance due to the waves created BY the ship when moving in calm water. The resistance created by external waves is called the ‘Added Wave Resistance’

In the Holtrop-Mennen method for resistance estimation, the following formulae are used for calculation of Wave Resistance:

We can see above that the presence of a bulb (A_{BT} is the bulb transverse area) leads to a reduction in the wave resistance by leading to a lower value of factor c_{2}.

## Additional pressure resistance of the Bulbous Bow (R_{B})

This is an additional resistance component due to the emergence of the bow above the water surface.

In the Holtrop-Mennen method, it is calculated using the following empirical formula:

We can see that the formula depends on the emergence of the bow above water (calculated from draft, height of bow and transverse area of bow).

## Additional pressure resistance of due to transom immersion (R_{TR})

Similar to the bow emergence leading to additional resistance, a vessel with Transom stern also experiences additional pressure resistance when the transom immerses in water.

The below empirical relation is used in Holtrop-Mennen method to calculate this component of resistance. We can see that the formula depends on the area of the immersed transom.

## Model-ship correlation resistance (R_{A})

The model-ship correlation resistance is added to account for the effect of hull roughness, which in turn, is attributed to a number of factors:

- Structural roughness – caused due to the method used in fabrication of the hull (welded/riveted), or due to the waviness of plates etc
- Paint roughness – due to paints of rough texture, or bad method of application
- Corrosion resistance – caused by corrosion of external shell plating
- Marine fouling of the hull

To account for the above, a correlation allowance is introduced, which is given by the formulation as below (in Holtrop-Mennen):

That brings us to the end of this discussion on using Holtrop-Mennen method for prediction of resistance of ship-shaped vessels. Please note that this method should be used only in early design phases, and is not to be relied upon for accuracy. For more firm predictions, it is recommended that a full-fledged resistance estimation be performed using a CFD analysis or a model test.

## References

- An approximate power prediction method, Holtrop Mennen, 1982
- Principles of Naval Architecture, Edward V. Lewis, Vol II
- ITTC document – https://www.ittc.info/media/8185/75-04-05-01.pdf
- ITTC document – https://ittc.info/media/2065/75-02-05-01.pdf
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number
- https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/ship-resistance-and-propulsion/modelship-correlation/F34DC26DAFDBA076213C9D5F67F6A762

TheNavalArch has developed its own calculator for estimating the resistance of a ship as per Holtrop-Mennen method. Please do take a moment to look at it below.

*Disclaimer: This post is not meant to be an authoritative writing on the topic presented. thenavalarch bears no responsibility for the accuracy of this article, or for any incidents/losses arising due to the use of the information in this article in any operation. It is recommended to seek professional advice before executing any activity which draws on information mentioned in this post. All the figures, drawings and pictures are property of thenavalarch except where indicated, and may not be copied or distributed without permission.*

## Designing a stanchion/stopper for sea-fastening of deck cargo

Introduction Stanchions – a familiar term for mariners and ship designers. What are Stanchions? A...

## Hydrogen as an alternative fuel for ships to reduce emissions

,This article first appeared in the Feb 2019 edition of Marine Engineers Review. It is being...

## Global wave statistical analysis and its use in deepwater operations

Why do we need wave analysis? For the design of offshore operations such as installation and...

## Designing bolts for a joint connection

Introduction Bolts are very commonly used fastening items and used in a variety of...

## The why and how of designing a lifting beam

Lifting beams are universally applied gear used widely in various types of lifting operations,...

## Draft Surveys: Methodology, Calculations, and common errors

Introduction Marine transport is the backbone of the global trade and reasonably can be...

## Designing a clip/dog plate for seafastening

Introduction In an earlier article, we saw how to design stoppers for seafastening. Stoppers are...

## The Bulbous Bow – types, characteristics, and effects

This is Part 2 of the two-part series on Bulbous Bows. For Part 1, click here By Tamal...

## Marine Propeller and Shafting Alignment – Part 2

Gap & Sag Alignment Gap and Sag Alignment is carried out to bring the engine to its final...

## Marine Propeller Shafting and Shafting Alignment – Part 1

*****This article first appeared in July 2018 edition of Marine Engineers' Review (MER), India....

I think CFD calculations become more and more Important. It is much more precise in comparison with empirical calculations and not so expensive as towing tank.